Security related news, crime prevention, new products, security advice and industry news

Police are solving only one in every four crimes, meaning some 3.1million offenders were able to cheat justice last year.

Despite an overall fall in recorded crime, Home Office figures revealed poorer detection rates for every category of offence.

Only 1.2million of the 4.3million cases handled by the police were cleared up.

And the picture could become even worse, with experts warning that up to 60,000 police staff will be axed because of budget cuts.

The biggest decreases were recorded in fraud and forgery, violence, sex crimes and some kinds of theft.

For burglary, the detection rate fell below 13 per cent – the equivalent of one in every eight offences.

This happened despite sharp falls in both police recorded crime and offences documented in the British Crime Survey – a study of 40,000 homes which includes incidents not reported to the authorities.

In 2009-10, the number of BCS crimes fell to 9.6million. This is nine per cent below the previous year, and the lowest level since records began in 1981.

Officials said it had dispelled fears of the recession-fuelled crimewave predicted by ex-Home Secretary Jacqui Smith in a notorious leaked memo.

The number of crimes recorded by police forces across England and Wales fell by 8 per cent, to 4.3million.

Yet the overall detection rate fell to 27.8 per cent, compared with 28.4 per cent in the previous year.

Almost all drug offences – 94 per cent – are detected, mainly because it is relatively straightforward to clear up a case of cannabis possession, the most common crime.

If drug offences are stripped out of the overall detection rate, the number of crimes solved falls to 24 per cent. Officers blame the figure on excessive bureaucracy and paperwork.

Police welcomed the falls in crime. Downing Street said the figures were ‘clearly down’, but that they were ’still too high’.

Sexual offences recorded by the police in 2009-10 totalled 54,509 – a 6 per cent increase on the previous year. But officials said police had been taking steps to enhance the recording of serious sex attacks.

Sharp rises in BCS woundings, robberies and muggings were dismissed as ‘not being significant’ because they were based on a small number of victim interviews.

It came as a report by an ex-chief constable and finance expert warned funding cuts could lead to the loss of up to 60,000 police officers and staff by 2015. Tim Brain, ex-head of Gloucestershire Police, said the figure represents the worst-case scenario after the Treasury told departments to prepare for cuts of 40 per cent.

Dr Brain, now Honorary Senior Research Fellow at Cardiff University, said that if the cuts were 25 per cent, the job losses would be between 11,500 and 17,000.

He warned: ‘This will mean fewer personnel for patrol, response and investigation duties.’

Dr Brain, who produced the report for Police Review magazine, said he expects the bulk of cuts to come through nonreplacement of police officers who retire and redundancies among civilian staff. Police cannot be made redundant.

Home Office chief statistician David Blunt said that, under the BCS measure, there were 6.5million fewer victims of crime in 2009/10 than in 1995.

He said the property crime results, with domestic burglaries down by 9 per cent and vehicle crime down by 17 per cent , were ‘ surprising’ . Improved security measures, including alarms and better locks as well as vehicle immobilisers are responsible for the falls, officials believe.

He said the trend of falling property crime has been seen in other developed countries.

Home Secretary Theresa May warned the figures offer only a ‘partial picture’, with anti-social behaviour and even murder excluded from the British Crime Survey.

She described the projected cuts in police numbers as ‘entirely speculative’.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1294902/Police-failing-clear-3-4-crimes-despite-fall-offending.html?ITO=1490#ixzz0u7SRNEKi

Source: Guardian, Date: 15 July 2010

The unexpected fall in the crime rate in the past year despite the deepest recession in the postwar era may be because crime is what economists could call an “old lagging indicator”.

As the justice secretary and former chancellor, Ken Clarke, suggested earlier this week, no one can prove cause and effect but he correctly pointed out that the fall in crime rates since 1995 had mainly been during periods of economic growth with strong employment levels and rising living standards.

Home Office criminologists were surprised that the predicted rise in property crime – mainly stealing from cars and burglaries – has not materialised since the onset of the recession.

They suggested that this could be because home and vehicle security is much better than during the previous recession of the early 1990s. All new cars have immobilisers and homes without basic window locks and security alarms are six times more likely to be burgled.

There may be some truth in this improving security argument but more powerful is likely to be the delayed rise in the unemployment rate. It is in this sense that crime is a “lagging” indicator that tends to follow a rise in joblessness.

As the public spending crunch leads to predictions of an extra million jobs disappearing in the next four years, it will be a miracle if Tory ministers can go into the next election able to boast about a fall in crime during their period in office.

Against this background, record prison numbers, record numbers of police officers, greater use of CCTV, a global fall in crime in developed countries and even a decline in the real value of many household items are all alleged to be behind the long-term fall in crime in England and Wales.

The Home Office noted them all but refused to commit itself to a single definitive explanation, describing them instead as “competing hypotheses”. One of the “more speculative alternatives” cited is the idea that car crime is a “debut offence” for offenders and the improved security has put off many a potential career criminal.

But it is the question of a link between the record prison population of 85,000 and the fall in the crime rate that is one of the most politically charged questions. The massive US jail population is said by some to be the reason crime has been falling there since 1988, while Canada has had a falling prison population and a falling crime rate.

Classic British criminology says there is an “incarceration effect” but it is small. It takes a rise of 25% in the prison population to cut the crime rate by 1% or 2%. On this basis it is likely that the 100% rise in prison numbers since 1992 is probably responsible for about 5% to 6% of the 50% fall in crime since the 1990s.

Source: CNET News, Date: 13 April 2010

In the week in which Google CEO Eric Schmidt has said his company is now “paranoid” about security (not an advert for Chrome at all), a lone milkman in the UK has expressed a paranoia that seems to have been dismissed by the great search engine in the sky (and on the ground).

Gordon Rayner is a 54-year-old man without a mountain bike.

He used to have a mountain bike, but, according to the Telegraph, Rayner says Google’s infinitely discreet Street View cameras published a picture of it to the world–which includes the underworld. The cameras happened upon his house, you see, while his garage door was open.

“When you look at the photograph, my face is blacked out, the windows of my house are blacked out but because the garage door was left open, you can clearly see everything in there,” he told the Telegraph.

The bike was stolen last month and thieves then made a return visit just to see if there was anything more they could take, but somehow didn’t manage to get back into the garage. “It is just an invitation for any criminal to take what they like,” Rayner told the Telegraph.

Google reportedly said that there has been no increase in crime since their cameras began to record the world’s innards. And one wonders whether criminals really have ceased to skip casing joints and turned to merely smoking them while scanning Street View looking for open garage doors. Somehow, I doubt it.

Source: Telegraph, Date: 27 August 2009

Users of social networking sites such as Facebook and Twitter could face higher insurance premiums because burglars may be using them to find out their personal details.

Millions of users post details about their home, as well as holiday plans, acting as an invitation to the burglars, according to insurers Legal & General.

The warning comes as a report called The Digital Criminal, commissioned by Legal & General, and prepared by Michael Fraser, the star of BBC’s Beat The Burglar, has been launched.

The Digital Criminal report, which polled 2,000 social network users, found nearly two fifths had posted details of their holiday plans, with nearly two thirds of 16-24 year-olds doing so.

Mr Fraser, a reformed thief, said: “There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that burglars are using social networks to identify likely targets.

“They gain confidence by learning more about them, what they are likely to own and when they are likely to be out of the house.

“I call it ‘internet shopping for burglars’. It is incredibly easy to use social neyworking sites to target people, and then scope out more information on their actual home using other internet sites like Google Street View, all from the comfort of the sofa.”

Graham Cluley, from web security firm Sophos, said it was “staggering” what information people were putting online.

“Our research shows that 41 per cent of people are divulging personal and private information to complete strangers on Facebook, such as their date of birth, where they worked, where they lived and what they were doing,” he said. “People are boasting about how they are having a fantastic time on a beach in Mexico on a webpage that has their home address.

“Criminals who put together the jigsaw can use it for identity theft or burglary. It is just as dangerous as leaving your windows or doors open at home.”

The report also found that almost half were unconcerned about social networking security. In an experiment, 100 friend requests were issued to random stranger. Nine out of 10 Twitter users accepted the stranger as a friend, with more than one in 10 Facebook users.

Privacy groups however have said insurance companies will simply use social networking sites to increase premiums.

Simon Davies, director of Privacy International, told The Daily Mail: “This is a disgraceful attempt to leverage yet more from customers.”

Malcolm Cooper, director of pricing and underwriting at Legal & General, said: “It’s a challenging one for the insurance industry. Just because someone is burgled, you can’t prove that it’s down to details posted on Facebook.

“It could be that we start asking how many youngsters are in the home for example.”

He said: “I had a few jobs when I left school at 15 but never really settled. Then I joined here and have never left.

“I viewed it as a long-term job but never had any idea I would be here for this long.”

In fact, before joining Mr Allinson had ideas of a future far away from locks, keys and metalwork.

He said: “When I was young and single, me and a few mates had plans to buy a bar in Ibiza, but you get a mortgage and get married and your priorities change.”

Mr Allinson was born in Ovenden and went to Oven-den Secondary Modern, and later The Ridings School. He has always lived in Calderdale.

He claims to have cut so many keys it would be impossible to count but guesses the figure would be into the hundreds of thousands.

“I’ve been in my role as a locksmith for 35 years and the techniques haven’t really changed in all that time. You can automate some of the processes but you will always need that human input to ensure the quality and accuracy.

“Nowadays I can probably cut a high-quality key in under 10 minutes.”

“I would maybe have retired a few years earlier if I’d had the money.”

Source: BBC News, Date: 24 January 2010

Police have issued an urgent appeal for information after powerful medicine and bullets were stolen in a house burglary in north Wales.

They said the break-in happened at the home of an RSPCA worker in Llangernyw, Abergele, Conwy on Saturday.

As well as personal items like bank cards, a metal box containing two glass bottles of the medicine Pentbarbitone Sodium and bullets was stolen.

Officers said they are concerned where these items are.

The robbery took place sometime between 1230 GMT and 1830 GMT on Saturday.

North Wales Police said anyone who witnessed any suspicious vehicles or suspicious behaviour in the Llangernyw area should come forward.

Anyone with information should contact officers at St Asaph on 101, or 0845 607 1001 (Welsh line) or 0-845 607 1002 (English line), or Crimestoppers anonymously on 0800 555 111.

Source: The Telegraph, Date: 22 January 2010

The threat of a terrorist attack has been raised to “severe” amid fears that al-Qaeda is planning a wave of attacks following the attempted Detroit bombing.

 Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab set an explosive device attached to his body alight while on the Northwest Airlines flight 253 from Amsterdam to Detroit on December 25. Alan Johnson’s announcement means that an attack is now “highly likely”. The decision follows analysis by the Joint Terrorism Analysis Centre (JTAC), a unit within MI5, and indicates an attack is now “highly likely.”

It was made following briefings to the Prime Minister by the heads of the security services MI5, MI6 and GCHQ and a meeting of the Government’s Cobra emergency committee.

Those present will include Hamid Karzai, the Afghan President, Ban Ki-moon, the UN Secretary-General and US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

Sources said the Detroit attack on Christmas Day, which demonstrated a new methodology and increased threat, was “one of the factors” but said the decision is taken after looking at intelligence “in the round.”

MI5 is watching around 2,000 individuals across Britain although the activity among domestic extremists is not thought to have risen significantly in recent months.

Alan Johnson, the Home Secretary said: “I should stress that there is no intelligence to suggest than an attack is imminent.

“JTAC keeps the threat level under constant review makes its judgments based on a broad range of factors, including the intent and capabilities of international terrorist groups in the UK and overseas.

“We still face a real and serious threat to the UK from international terrorism so I would urge the public to remain vigilant and carry on reporting suspicious events to the appropriate authorities and to support the police and security services in their continuing efforts to discover, track and disrupt terrorist activity.”

Gordon Brown warned earlier this week that “a number of terrorist cells are actively trying to attack Britain and other countries.”

His speech to the House of Commons came after he received a briefing on the latest intelligence at a meeting of the Cabinet’s National Security Committee.

Mr Brown said the failed attack over Detroit on Christmas Day signalled “the first operation mounted outside Arabia by al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula.”

He also talked about the increased threat from Somalia in East Africa and the Sahel in West Africa, adding that there would be a greater degree of intelligence sharing with foreign countries.

Umar Farouq Abdulmutallab, who tried to set off a bomb in his underwear, has warned his FBI interrogators that up to 20 “more like me” may be preparing further attacks.

The government is setting up a new ‘watch list’ system to try and stop terrorist suspects boarding planes.

MI5, MI6 and the GCHQ listening centre have also begun setting up “joint investigating and targeting teams”, which are designed to address potential threats before suspects might reach Britain.

The teams are designed to work with the Joint Terrorism Analysis Centre to collect, share and use intelligence.

The US Department for Homeland Security said the measures effectively put Britain at the same alert level as America following the Christmas Day attack.

Severe is the fourth of five threat levels. The level was reduced to “substantial” last July for the first time in four years after a judgment was made that there had been a “chilling” effect on terrorism in Britain.

The assessment is based on a range of factors including intelligence, current terrorist activity, comparison with events in other countries and previous attacks.

MI5 say that it is rare that specific intelligence about a threat is available and can be relied on and that more often, judgements about the threat will be based on a wide range of information, which is often “fragmentary”.

Those elements include what is known about the capabilities of terrorists, the method they may use, and the potential scale of the attack as well as the targets they would consider attacking.

Source: The Independent, Date: 12 January 2010

As everyone knows, there are at least two sides to every story. Here is what the television presenter Myleene Klass believes happened to her the other night. In the kitchen of her Potters Bar house, with her little daughter asleep upstairs and her boyfriend away, Ms Klass suddenly becomes aware of some men entering her garden and moving in her direction. She grabs a knife and bangs at her window. The men run off.

According to Klass’s agent, Jonathan Shalit, she was subsequently warned by the police that her brandishing of an “offensive weapon” was illegal: “Myleene was aghast when she was told that the law did not allow her to defend herself at home. All she did was scream loudly and wave the knife to try to frighten them off. She is not looking to be a vigilante.”

This is not how the Hertfordshire police recall their encounter at the Klass home: “Officers spoke to reassure the home owner, talked through security and gave advice in relation to the importance of reporting suspicious activity immediately to allow officers to act appropriately. At no point were any official warnings given to the home owner in relation to the use of a knife or offensive weapon in their [sic] home.”

Well, agents are employed to help publicise their clients, so I suppose you could say that Mr Shalit saw the episode as a chance to get a picture of Ms Klass on the front page of a newspaper, if the story was good enough (which it was). On the other hand, we know that the police have a visceral dislike of any member of the public using physical force against criminals: they regard this as their natural monopoly and are enthusiastic in supplying evidence for the trial and conviction of any householder who dares – as they would see it – “to take the law into their own hands.”

This extends beyond the confines of hearth and home. I was intrigued by the comments of a Metropolitan Police spokesman last week, following the murder in Barking of 31-year-old Sukhwinder Singh, stabbed to death after he pursued two men who had run off with the handbag of a lady called Karamjit Kaur. Doubtless Mr Singh was outraged to see Ms Kaur being punched by the muggers as they took her possessions, and his sense of natural justice – gallantry, even – must have taken over from any fear he might have had at challenging her assailants. Detective Inspector John Sandlin agreed that Mr Singh was “very brave”, but added: “I would not encourage people to get involved; I’d encourage people to call 999 so the police can respond.”

How many readers – do let me know – believe that had Mr Singh dialled 999, the muggers would have been apprehended and Ms Kaur’s handbag returned to her? Indeed, just how much time would the police have devoted to the admittedly thankless task of detection? I think we know what would have happened. Ms Kaur might have been offered some counselling for her trauma, and given a list of “ways to reduce your chances of being mugged”.

The Ministry of Justice actually puts such a list online, under the infuriatingly breezy title “Top tips for staying safe from robbery”. It tells us: “If you’re carrying a bag, try to have it across your chest”– yes, that would really flummox the muggers. Other “top tips” include: “Plan your route in advance”, “Don’t carry important documents or credit cards that you don’t need”, and “Only take your wallet out when you need to”.

This is the sort of advice one might expect from a Foreign Office advisory note for people thinking of travelling to a particularly dangerous and lawless trouble spot. I find it both depressing and enraging that we are expected by the British government to walk our own streets in the same spirit of heightened alertness and institutionalised fearfulness.

You might think, given the thousands of extra policemen employed since this government came to power, that we would feel the streets to be safer than ever; but as we know, this has not translated so much into boots on the ground – the coppers protest that they have to spend almost all their working hours filling out forms, or performing a myriad of other acts of compliance with the baroque legislative complexity beloved of New Labour.

On the other hand, the police themselves have devised a most efficient way of reducing their ability to deal with opportunist crime on the streets – over the past decade or more, they have made it the norm to patrol on foot only in pairs (chatting happily away to each other all the while), thus cutting by half the amount of streets covered at any one time. The new-ish Metropolitan Commissioner has been making a spirited attempt to force the return of single-policeman patrolling. Sir Paul Stephenson – a much more impressive figure than his lamentable predecessor Sir Ian Blair – told me a couple of months ago that he will leap out of his car to harangue officers if he sees them patrolling in pairs; but there is a much wider problem here of an institution dangerously detached from the public it is designed to serve, a far cry from Sir Robert Peel’s founding principle that “the Police are the public and the public are the police”.

Fortunately, where a complacent monopoly fails to deliver, there is – in any reasonably free country – always a market alternative. For some years now, it has been noticeable how the smarter London neighbourhoods have banded together to pay private security to patrol their streets. What is also noticeable is that the private contractors do not huddle in self-protective pairs.

You can argue that this is all very well for London’s rich, who can afford such special arrangements for their security, but is of no use to the poorer neighbourhoods, who are even more vulnerable to crime. Yet the BBC recently reported from Darlington that residents were paying between £2 and £4 a week to have their homes included in regular patrols by private security firms and to receive “an instant response” if they need help.

This has infuriated the Police trade union – the Police Federation of England and Wales – which says it has “huge concern” over “the powers and accountability” of these private sector providers. Of course, it is not really these firms’ “powers and accountability” which is making the Police Federation concerned – they have no legal powers whatsoever – but just the very fact that their presence on the streets is a visible reminder of the public’s lack of faith in the police to do the job.

Sir Ian Blair (why can’t he just vanish from public life?) told the BBC in November that “I do not see community safety as a commodity to be bought and sold and therefore we shouldn’t have the private sector in policing”– for all the world as if we don’t “buy” policing through our taxes, but simply get it out of the goodness of their hearts. Besides, the local authorities themselves, the notional employers of police forces, use private sector security guards in housing estates, libraries and offices: so why shouldn’t there be competition for the right to deliver the general public’s security?

Apart from the fact that competition always has the beneficial effect of shaking up any self-serving monopoly, no private sector security firm has the right to threaten us with prosecution if we choose to defend ourselves rather than call on their services.

Home Security and Burglary Prevention starts with understanding basic layers of protection and prevention. While a sticker or a sign isn’t “secure”, it is a deterrent and creates doubt in the mind of the burglar. There are a number of creative measures you can take to protect your home and family. www.abbeylocks.co.uk

In this episode Jes cons a Locksmith into opening a locked door to someone Else’s house and walks out with over £4000 of stolen property.

Abbey Locks and Security always insist on seeing photo ID with proof of address (driving licence or passport!) before any entry is gained. If customers do not have ID on them at the time, they will be required to provide it once we have gained entry, failure to do this will mean the Police will be notified. We  recommend that you always shred any personal documents that can be used for ID theft by fraudsters. This sort of crime is unfortunately on the increase from our experience. For information how to better secure your property and security advice please call us or e-mail. Our surveys are free of charge.